Military PARADOX

I have no desire to own a gun but I have respect for the right (to own one.)

Personal gun ownership meant that raising taxes for military maintenance was minimal. Conservative posturing is ONLY defensive. That makes Presidents Carter and Clinton the most conservative since President Eisenhower. Aggressive military action makes a liberal gamble toward empire.
The NeoCON administration was the most liberal ever! AND the fourteen trillion dollar debt (mainly by military spending deficit) cannot make the future responsible for what WAS DONE TO them. If weapons didn't make some (phony conservatives) aggressive, an individuals defense would become acceptable socialism (because it isn't financial skimming like insurance has become.)

Because it is a "pooling" of weapons for the common good, there is nothing more socialistic (as commonly understood*) than an army, (*mostly because of the hierarchy of authority.) The tax percentage invested in our military makes us the most socialistic country imaginable.
Insurance is a pooling of money for the "common good" which was how we were tricked into a socialism that gambles with disaster. Only the wealthy (obsessive compulsive hoarders) had insurance before WWII. Prosperity from the ASSURANCE policy, called Social Security (for a good reason,) made US think we could ALL play that game.
Does anyone (really) CHOOSE to not have insurance? You can choose the caveman, the gekko, the stack of bills w/ google eyes, etc. but they are all GEICO, making Warren Buffet super wealthy! Social Security is your right to bare arms in that it is defensive. Republics ARE entitlements (to participate.) Those who would remove entitlements are socialists. What kind of entitlements do you find in the military?

We believe the military projects our freedom but how free are individuals in military service? Ask Bradley Manning about his freedom of speech.
Just by growing the military population weakens the reach of constitutional protection. (not to mention prison growth!)
Military is a "wrong tool" paradox in that we are driving in nails we should be pulling out.
Why not a Department of Peace in The Cabinet?
The right to bare arms is one of those exceptional thoughts, because exceptions were made before rules or we couldn't all be made so exceptional, and rules of military service limit the freedoms of individuality.

social butterfly or grub?

The degree to which someone supports the military could (psycho-logically) determine how much they support (the most demanding form of) socialism....
those who (spitefully) call me socialistic are usually more socialistic than me with symptoms of acting in-spite of themselves (with oxymoronic standards)...
to the degree someone is spiteful of psychology is the odds that their self respect* needs psychological help...
*respect = understanding & I don't understand the need for military investment...
but I'm considered socially invested...

A Denial Admission

HOW WILL I KNOW I'M in denial?
How often do you tell others THEY are in denial?

How do I convince myself that when I admit denial I gain truth?
Honestly, the truth IS effort to consider. GOoD exercise

Sharing the truth becomes compromised with the SANTA(n) story. How much resentment from truth being told?
So much is contrived to entertain our attention deficit disorders.

Excuses are good symptoms of denying response abilities.
Reflexive repetition relieves the responsibility of research.

This is why conservatism IS less expensive.
Maintaining tradition is a derivative of past values,
to deny things from growth is defensive behavior,
considering offensive compensation for indulgence. (creating costs)

Responsible behavior extends attention as credit factors.
Capacity for denial is a challenge to reverse growth without attention.

Every time I see denial behavior in others I purposely apply my memory to relate.
Learning from others' mistakes can deny the experience from my reflexes.

Human options

HUMAN BEING is half verb... (being human)
hint.. if being was the noun then human would be an adjective
If you don't understand me..
could it be as a thinking being dealing with feelings, reflexes defend being patho-logical.. (critical limitation)
I try to suggest how a feeling being could develop thought in response abilities... (supportive care)
The choice of awareness is neither just..
a) Appreciation of careful intention (Happiness)
or
b) Critical conceptualizing of what might be missing (frustration)

Consider the balance as currency between positive and negative poles and how alternating energy is more powerful than direct current... like (Tesla vs. Edison) The direct current needs to keep being regenerated like reflexive conditioning.
Education goes further if both sides of an issue dialog together rather than letting debate fragment the partnership paradox.
The noun is the victimizer and actions are results of what is expected of the victim..
conservatism victimizes the actions of progressive revelation potential.
Respect is the quality that allows public optioning.
The public is human but being is optional? (on having a being)

What good is having money if what is done for it devalues the quality of being content?
We tolerate the frustration because we think we can buy happiness?
Can the human being be healthier than being reflexive, to deny options?

appreciate it

"Love it or leave it!" was a concept I heard expressed during the Viet Nam war in defense of government policies. This authoritarian demand was based on majority rule. Now when people say, "Love it or leave it." and they realize they are in the minority should they be expelled by their own standard?

I understand mediation as attempting agreement. The above paragraph stated a fact then made a suggestion in the form of a question. Could the behavior of a conceptual change attract better values?

I react in a similar way to the people I believe are trying to debate me, so I reflexively react to their terms and limitations of their understanding, (as I see them.) Frustrated behavior aggravates defenses to the point of being offensive. I still suck at relaxing to endure my discomfort with democratic diversity. Addressing frustration could be the introduction to asking what we agree with for the kind of dialog President Obama could be appreciated for demonstrating under pressure.

UOme-s for IOU-s

Paradox understanding keeps negative excess toxins in balance.
To introduce evolution as education allows time before expected interest is reasonable.
Excess separates reason from reality materially while conceptually educational.

Could the financial reflexes be easy to understand in reverse?

When the state of California started issuing IOUs
I realized the national deficit as time to tell the government UOme values are health related for unity defeatists.
Privacy entitlements used public service funds to defeat democratic standards (complcating rules & rights.)
The debt is a mistake in (manifest) destiny that popped the privacy cherry as all out rape.
Victimizers are reflexively helping create victims without know they are one too.
The statistics are the evidence that binds the responsible to the misTAKE.

Creating ease assurance
is the kind of agent role
past government has gone
unpaid for by those getting & taking
advantages with contributions.

Re-create (& educate) the lobby game
by trustworthy mediation regulators
(exposing fear creation containment
allowing journalistic observation
for statistical value balancing)
to encourage supportive behaviors.

peek into paradox

The California government (representative spectrum)
can't allow the money management to creatively reach agreement?

The lack of money is why there is no jobs to create it!
There are so many volunteer workers available
as support has been in so much need
to demonstrate willingness to dialog
even without proper credit
as projected administratively
who caused the lacking by not downsizing
on self importance except for responsibility.

This implies the paying jobs are not
creating support values on daily experience budget.
So...What if work ethics have been mutated
to distract judicial understanding
with contractual conditioning pathology?

Behavior observation is better evaluation
developing debt-less "punitivity" . .
Allowing for the "on (the) otherside" values is
what builds our allowance.

when you project..

...how much I am vane (vain)
is how much you blow...
and vice versa, if you get it,
the directions will change,
positioning, from leg to leg...
if intention is balanced,
point of progress or spin?

poor (/wealthy) loser?

The Republican behavior demonstrates "Victimizer" mentality!
so the more OBAMA is their "victim" the more he is related to the majority that is growing exponentially!
Only victimizers (should) see socialism as a threat
with/to everything thing there was (capital*) to lose
was (in) their "*power of advantage."
Bernard Madoff demonstrated how the reflex sucks
even "friends" for all they got!
..soon we will STOP bailing-out victimizers and
admit the social(infra)structure IS the victim
that deserves the same Single Payer health care
the Government "victimizes" themselves with...
reparation would pay participation supple*mentally.

Know Thyself

..when Jesus said he was the son of God,
did he just mean Himself?
...or was he offering a choice?
..to join Him?
...how much exclusivity do you
project on others' spiritual being? (inclusively?)

Religions are supplements for those who
don't get enough spirituality in their diet...
don't take that wrong, I try many
supplements everyday..

more or less!

...people take the point
to set themselves apart, but
yearn to give their part
to com.unity points...
for integrity to balance...
or they feel pointless...
victims...

stimulating / relaxation

The concept of the breath as
the seed of meditation practices,
allows for the paradox balance
as stimulating relaxation.
The oxygen filling the inhale
feeds every cell as suggested
by the space made when relaxing
allows for an exhale.

Consciousness is relatively reflexive.
Awareness responds as attention.
The purest attention is to pay respect.
To be constant in appreciation could be
the equality of individual meditations.

Paradoxymorons

If the guys who broke the economic system
get forgiveness for something so big,
then all our little debts are nothing . .
They need to understand forgiveness
values and distribute the weight with integrity.

Asset holes dumped on their food.
To start a new garden, of budding credit,
plow all debt under, as educational statistics,
and encourage tending the weeds as mulch.

"I like to watch" ~ Chauncey Gardener~Being There

Profit value exchange paradox

The more money you had, the more lost with every fluctuation.
My neighbor was told her house could sell for over a million dollars but the reality fluctuated to the tune of a quarter of a million dollar loss in two months.
When she agreed to pay less than $20,000.00 around 1970 that (might have) seemed like more of a liability than feeling like she lost $250,000.00 last year, by waiting four years to cash-in a "sure thing."
If she hadn't projected she had so much worth the loss of value (to her) wouldn't have been so extreme.
Projection needs a screen and the screen of money has lost high definition value.
The acquisition of personal assets can be symptomatic of how investors feel about their country and attitude they contribute to their culture.
Less money could be a more "free-time" lifestyle choice and (so) suggestions of struggling sustainability may be a projection of the definer.
Victimizers had assets in proportion to taking advantage of social weakness(es) for money.

The "get poor" lifestyle has much less anxiety than grow rich impulses imply.
(*Lettuce) Yield unto Caesar what is Romaine. (salad*)

self-reference solvent

I found a paradox battery this morning. These two, potentially useful sentences, together can electrocute logic into another dimension;
The following sentence is false.
The preceding sentence is true.

My favorite example is Ben Franklin's,
"I so admire the truly humble that
if I were one I'd be so proud."

paradox power

required donation
for
spiritual manifestation

fairly advantageous

The problem with seeking advantage is the sacrifice of (healthy) fairness.

paradox of aging

though I work hard to simplify . .
I find it harder to believe in simple solutions

tied 2 chi

The paradoxical oxymoron for today is,
the effort of waiting shows
in the relaxation of my action

oxy-dox

It was oxymorons that really got me INTO paradox, and which had the better balance in terms of conflict / resolution, it was a work / oppertunity for an equal / individual towards imposed (manditory) freedom from this organized / chaos I felt almost / complete before I made the perfect / mistake, honest / opinion (truthful / bias).