Military PARADOX

I have no desire to own a gun but I have respect for the right (to own one.)

Personal gun ownership meant that raising taxes for military maintenance was minimal. Conservative posturing is ONLY defensive. That makes Presidents Carter and Clinton the most conservative since President Eisenhower. Aggressive military action makes a liberal gamble toward empire.
The NeoCON administration was the most liberal ever! AND the fourteen trillion dollar debt (mainly by military spending deficit) cannot make the future responsible for what WAS DONE TO them. If weapons didn't make some (phony conservatives) aggressive, an individuals defense would become acceptable socialism (because it isn't financial skimming like insurance has become.)

Because it is a "pooling" of weapons for the common good, there is nothing more socialistic (as commonly understood*) than an army, (*mostly because of the hierarchy of authority.) The tax percentage invested in our military makes us the most socialistic country imaginable.
Insurance is a pooling of money for the "common good" which was how we were tricked into a socialism that gambles with disaster. Only the wealthy (obsessive compulsive hoarders) had insurance before WWII. Prosperity from the ASSURANCE policy, called Social Security (for a good reason,) made US think we could ALL play that game.
Does anyone (really) CHOOSE to not have insurance? You can choose the caveman, the gekko, the stack of bills w/ google eyes, etc. but they are all GEICO, making Warren Buffet super wealthy! Social Security is your right to bare arms in that it is defensive. Republics ARE entitlements (to participate.) Those who would remove entitlements are socialists. What kind of entitlements do you find in the military?

We believe the military projects our freedom but how free are individuals in military service? Ask Bradley Manning about his freedom of speech.
Just by growing the military population weakens the reach of constitutional protection. (not to mention prison growth!)
Military is a "wrong tool" paradox in that we are driving in nails we should be pulling out.
Why not a Department of Peace in The Cabinet?
The right to bare arms is one of those exceptional thoughts, because exceptions were made before rules or we couldn't all be made so exceptional, and rules of military service limit the freedoms of individuality.

well, fair, productive

My values are at variance with many that society takes for granted.
Maybe society has created a compliant insanity by majority rules?
There are many indicators that we don't live in a well or fair state.
What job responsibility could address that fear of the Welfare State?

There are conceptual properties that are interfering with America's original right to own property. Our Founding Fathers came from the era when monarchs owned all the property of a country (and it's empire) so They were attempting to design a proper property for individuals to manage. The ultimate private interest (the king) was confronted to create the best republic they could. This was a social movement as the first paragraph of Common Sense clearly implies. Protection of property is how government earns confidence. Doesn't it seem like a majority of Americans would vote no-confidence in this government? How much should we think that is insane?

The colonial agrarian economy was at a pace with natural progression that was distorted by concepts allowed by an industrial revolution. Profit worked great when measured by production values. What seems to be challenging economic integrity is how information and service is sold for profit.
Service and information is where advantage can be taken conceptually.
My parents were social workers who were pioneers of a social service era. The entitlement of a stable government inspired the creation of assurances like Social Security according to fairly ideal standards.

The wealthy interpretation was to create an insurance market that is based on gambling. This insurance "industry"(?) is proving the imbalance of values that became pervasive with the acceptance of governmental lotteries. So many pay every week with hope for something they will never experience. Insurance makes us pay every month for something we never hope to use. How rational is that?

The deficit is a result of gambling attitudes. But how can the future be held responsible for the behavior of the past, monetarily? How can the nonexistent (kids) account for a conceptual derivative? Maybe it doesn't exist! Doesn't it seem more like an admission of borrowing in order to gamble? This could be a value of (and owed to) those who were used.

Insurance is socialism as a collective pool and the administration profits are by authoritarianism. Every corporate subsidy is authoritarian socialism. Democratic socialism has become the only cure, so redefine re:public again!

Wealth seems to be a style of compulsive obsessive hoarding. The more I have (of anything powerful) the more I am removed from a balanced reality and the more defensive I become. Those with the most have the most to lose. Money has become a harsh demanding master monarch/victimmiser.

The new confidence could come from a credit game that doesn't create debt. Overthrow the monarch money with three branches of economy. Divide the deficit into potential credit that can be accessible by staying well and fairly well-balanced. Every patient is important for the practice of medicine so they should get paid to submit to compliant health goals. This rewards credit for caring for our bodies as a national interest for life, liberty, and the pursuit of contentment. Even happiness seems to have a price!

The best liberty we have now is to indulge in education. Doesn't the entitlement for education lack the values of observation and or appreciation? Universities should financially credit students for completing stages of research and development. This could be the redistribution of interest to recreate the best American production behavior that proper investment deserves. If students came into society with credit to invest, those in the profit branch of economy could make products beyond reproach.

If the fastest growing job is collection agent, is it a symptom of inappropriate use of power / energy? I have implied that the insurance job market created a parasite that is a tumor in the system of banking that has derived un-empathetic harm to our well-being. It is easier to just live with a parasite than to treat it. The immediate problem with so little choice of jobs is what limited hope humanity has been forced to accept. Re:vision jobs!

The job of regulator is a type of mediation that needs to relax the punishment of judgment and expedite educational as healthy observations of trustworthy credit. Isn't that the next step from pollster, to increase the value of that information? This could be the role of government if economics were removed, The Founding Fathers had the hint that law-making and law-enforcement (& militia) was the cause of taxation. Regulate that burden by repealing the mistakes of the past. Forgive so we don't have to forget the lessons of these mistakes. The deficit is a symptom that reparations are deserved if relative to three respectful styles of coexistence. . . production, thought development, and health care.

contentment as free-key

Could this indus-trial culture have made the job commitment a compulsive confinement?

You don't want to think your job perpetuates social injustice, but if you see "social injustice" there becomes a separation from your working role and that feeling of personal freedom. Integrity could be the principle that working for yourself represents. Independents need credit, free from the designers of penalties..

Monetary demands force us to sell our time to other victim-misers who need it because credit has been derived into a bet against debt (for insurance sake.)
Why should I save, I'm covered!

The impulse to gamble has to be forgiven in order to cure too much passion, for derived securities...

I forgive so I don't have to forget... I learn contentment so I don't have to be happy, because the desire for happiness is frustration... thus a gamble.

Creative energy encourage us to design jobs that allow social contentment?

IN& out/line credit relief

The business of selling conceptual products became debt by the fact that nothing exists to return interest except entertainment value.
Receipt certification for ideas. Movies are great examples of selling the story as a production..

The financial system has become a disservice industry as a developed act, like paying for job performance. The characterization is symptom of abuse.
They play with money others have created from resource development.

Farming inspired toolmaking that became a craft of incorporating components.
The product represented standards of production to make it profit for design manifestation, what you see is what you get until details get technical.
Risk is conceptual misdirection of funding a gamble, like looking for a sure thing. What else justifies paying (monthly) for a bail-out you hope to never need to collect?

Misfortune is the motivator to create insurance vehicles, like allowance for extravagance to motivate indulgence.
There is increased desperation to find funding for or from insurance.
Gambling is a rich man's sport that perverts natural instincts into statistics or odds.

Money dominates the values of living that can distract people from the care factor, such as family time.
The deficit created implies a credit to extend values for what is better in the future!

Management recognizes alternating talent distribution to serve the personality of a culture as exchange appreciation. Understanding past dynamics increases preparation for future considerations.
This implies a natural sense of balancing tendencies to dominate partnerships with behavior becoming more trustworthy.

I believe there is a conceptual responsibility to free the governmental influence from faulty financial powers by authorizing influence peddling redistribution of the "lost" money, Innovate healthy attitude development as a debtless risk credit. This could create reparation for the stress invested by losers of a rigged series of disservices like insurance and trust manipulators that got their bail-out cashed out.