responsexistence

Conclusions mean we're finished here… ?

Conceptual thinking is the start of something new. It is literally beyond reality to have consideration for something that hasn't existed before. That IS what makes the human element unreal, and there in lies the capacity to destroy our own environment, thus proving us uncivilized. Non-existence could be becoming our responsibility.

Sense abilities are derived from the sense that triggered awareness. Response abilities develop when experience becomes a partner with awareness to generate perspective.

The example of two eyes which have drawn similar individual conclusions of a flat world, UNTIL, as partners in awareness, the proper spectacle will allow an emerging property of a 3rd dimension, increasing conceptual values, thus the quality of a view.

Did I allow a glimpse of "something else"? NO CONCLUSIONS! Is it a questionable freedom to conceive when change is necessary... ?

feeling fluidity flooding

The appreciation of living is a choice.
We see quite a few critical reflexes without appreciating their relationships.
Appreciation and criticism are equal and opposite reactions to each other.
Appreciative people will attract criticism as critical people find admiring appreciation equally?

Being shrewd is when the fun thoughts turns to cost effectiveness.
Financial understanding finds variants to sharing response abilities manipulatively.
The motivation to be productive can be considered domination.
Where shrewdness merges with energy it becomes forceful.
Deceptive force is / in denial causing depression in variant odds makes sense more often.

It is shrewd to deny regrets because it removes the cost of choice.
Regrets prove that a choice must eliminate (change) something that was cared for.
If choices are made for us the regrets are projected in a symptomatic style.
Can we respect behavior motivators as response abilities recognize relativities.
Destiny often means God's choice. Who can design an inclusive destiny?

Appreciation accepts the production profits as / in creative properties materialistically.
Who will put the "proper" back in property?
Concepts are too creative to derive profit without degrees of deception / speculation.
Support for concepts have degrees of extortion by styles of asking for investment.
Invested interest yields appreciation, or will critics change the rules again.

Critical intent is the expression of self-judgment just by style of delivery.
The strongest release is from weakness partnership / victim of roles.
How we tend to being pretentious depending on entertaining values?

Couldn't frustration motivate the effort to realize change appropriately, half the time, if by fair odds?
Credit should be the contentment of critical appreciation. centered on neutralizing charges of dominance.
Health and education should have no debt (by profit motive) attached, by being a derived value of creative representative investment as in becoming national asset.

The Agent fee the tax represents is not fairly appreciated by the benefactors. that they would charge appropriately if responsible enough to comply creatively.
If there was a test for integrity, the donations of the appropriately appreciative (entertainer/ celebrity) styling contribution attitudes to fill in the obvious fear of losing more if you have to have dominance as / in their own penalty attitude amplification to needing desires.
Debating loses half the argumentative values in judgment so evaluation is recognized in dialog.
Enlightened founding fathers discussed how taxes were the cost of law making and enforcement so that if principles adapted by examples of honesty, public pride would balance off privacy piracy.

yield to suggestion

Hopefully, I can present myself as a conceptual artist with this suggestion;

Someday count how many STOP signs you relate to in a day.
This authoritarian demand, STOP, is framed in a red-hot octagon.

In Elementary school my kids saw the motorcycle cop parked on their path, hiding to catch drivers at the stop sign.
At Freitas Prkwy and Del Ganado my kids have seen the cop cars parked on a sidewalk between two fences, harvesting that stop sign.
Stop signs have an attitude of trap when the real test is if you care.

So what if there was a big-red-heart-sign,
in that triangular shape ~ like a yield sign,
it could imply the potential decision at an intersection,
and ~ if the four big white letters said, "CARE,"

then maybe a better attitude to respect the pedestrians, and the neighborhoods, and the reactions of others could be encouraged.

Even if this never actually happens on the street level,
I have now planted that image in your realm of choice
and you can choose to see a better style of accepting traffic congestion, with relaxed confidence in others to share your care . .

Can I suggest you choose that attitude, and see that heart?
Thank you for the consideration.

forward values

Conceptual care is appreciation, "not doing to others what you would not have done to you," sounds like Golden Rule variation, but I call it The Original Edit.
Relativity Theory comes from, "For every action, observe equal and opposite reactions."
There is a paradox behavior of projected experience victimizing levels of awareness.
Thomas Paine, in Common Sense, referred to a Great Jewish Leader (from the Bible) who was offered power over the tribe, and warned what leadership implied as limiting favored roles.
Behavior is symptomatic, people who want harm (to others) are harm-full (reflexively), but supportive experience shows generosity is (the only) curative balance choice.
Like how Europe converted to Euros, a world credit for creativity, needs to allow those with symptoms of corruption to transfer their "manure money" into a "Not for Profit" Service Economy (garden.)
Understanding care giving is the ultimate waste management.

The Information Age is proving authority cycles deteriorate much faster than what trust (they) can contain.
The need to tell others "what to do" can evolve into suggestive support, especially when we understand the power of the best example.
This becomes the Response Ability Theory.
Relativity and "Responsibility", pay "Respect" for a creative education evolution based on three real Rs.
When you PAY attention, the choice is (naturally) better appreciation or something worse.

dream of green-coal

. . when I became lucid, the oil-level was being checked before kiln temper-stage made large pellets of specific designed power generator made to sell back to China to lower emissions destined for our California shores. The legal complications slipped past military base locations to balance agricultural economic development. The base in my dream was the closest to San Simeon (Fort Roberts). The next day Shelley told me W. R. Hearst made hemp illegal to manipulate profit he could make from forestry lands and mills selling newsprint to his interstate newspaper conglomerate.

Military property turns investment back
into Founding Father hemp energy plants,
growing Green-coal power plants,
allowing eco-logical agricultural balance
to support techno-logical developing freedoms.
Infrastructure entitlements echo-social
necessities shared as cultural bonding.

Contributions to individual candidates
consolidated are owed to supportive classes.
Services and information need values beyond
profit-driven production (which) hasn't proved
waste-management skills will be paid respect.
Compensation for mistakes!?
Taxing abuse, even by neglect!
Corporate advantage to cycles of support
corrections for traps that hurt integrity
of service quality healthy attitudes.
Personal power unifies to share potential.

Freedom Grants

The freedom fight for The United States was a property revolution . .
With inTOXICating symptoms spreading greed like manifest destiny . .
Feeling unbalanced entitlement allowed indigenous values to be violated.
Un-grandparents of this era help us understand how victimizing behavior can be.
Trends spin through cycles of quality development rooted most on property owned.
Attachments cost us freedom by defensive diversions like denial and fences.
Shared properties are conceptual making communities mutual funds.
The trust is an investment vehicle for accumulating conceptual values (properties).
Building trust is fundamental for feeling freedom.

The limit of trust sells insurance and other counter-concepts.
Credit card companies should create a grant program for debt payment based on a community service model to encourage donation reflexes by providing the medicine to heal a social-ill they should take some responsibility for.