Bradisms

I'm a mountain but I'll get over it!

My Photo
Name:
Location: San Rafael, No. Cal., United States

Journaling conceptual design trends, mostly as "stream of consciousness" as encouragement. Environmental resolve will teach us peace. Paradox mediation provides the next healthy attitude.

Friday, February 03, 2012

bad habits

The search for virtue is a natural dilemma of the human of critical pathology that turns respect into fear...

Labels:

Wednesday, August 04, 2010

feeling fluidity flooding

The appreciation of living is a choice.
We see quite a few critical reflexes without appreciating their relationships.
Appreciation and criticism are equal and opposite reactions to each other.
Appreciative people will attract criticism as critical people find admiring appreciation equally?

Being shrewd is when the fun thoughts turns to cost effectiveness.
Financial understanding finds variants to sharing response abilities manipulatively.
The motivation to be productive can be considered domination.
Where shrewdness merges with energy it becomes forceful.
Deceptive force is / in denial causing depression in variant odds makes sense more often.

It is shrewd to deny regrets because it removes the cost of choice.
Regrets prove that a choice must eliminate (change) something that was cared for.
If choices are made for us the regrets are projected in a symptomatic style.
Can we respect behavior motivators as response abilities recognize relativities.
Destiny often means God's choice. Who can design an inclusive destiny?

Appreciation accepts the production profits as / in creative properties materialistically.
Who will put the "proper" back in property?
Concepts are too creative to derive profit without degrees of deception / speculation.
Support for concepts have degrees of extortion by styles of asking for investment.
Invested interest yields appreciation, or will critics change the rules again.

Critical intent is the expression of self-judgment just by style of delivery.
The strongest release is from weakness partnership / victim of roles.
How we tend to being pretentious depending on entertaining values?

Couldn't frustration motivate the effort to realize change appropriately, half the time, if by fair odds?
Credit should be the contentment of critical appreciation. centered on neutralizing charges of dominance.
Health and education should have no debt (by profit motive) attached, by being a derived value of creative representative investment as in becoming national asset.

The Agent fee the tax represents is not fairly appreciated by the benefactors. that they would charge appropriately if responsible enough to comply creatively.
If there was a test for integrity, the donations of the appropriately appreciative (entertainer/ celebrity) styling contribution attitudes to fill in the obvious fear of losing more if you have to have dominance as / in their own penalty attitude amplification to needing desires.
Debating loses half the argumentative values in judgment so evaluation is recognized in dialog.
Enlightened founding fathers discussed how taxes were the cost of law making and enforcement so that if principles adapted by examples of honesty, public pride would balance off privacy piracy.

Labels: ,

Monday, July 19, 2010

re-solve reality

Being removed from reality has both a better and worse interpretation.

Awareness has choice elements from critical thoughts to feeling appreciative.

The point of journalistic observation is that description places facts in time.

Symptomatic reflexes from experience respond in a kind of stylistic pattern.

Prerequisite behaviors determine standards of educational relationships.

The relative construct of responses qualifies our value systems as reality.

Inevitable changing points of view limit lifetimes into stories that begin and end.

Between conception and completion reality can change the truth perspective often.

Truth is an agreement to believe we choose to share understanding processes.

Appreciation is in what we invest our interests.

Passion is when rational thought relaxes to allow emerging properties to emote.

Attitude is the recognition of resolve between supporting and editing priorities.

Focus of interest is the payment of attention for what must be eliminated is critical.

Emotions remind our thoughts that life-energy creates a reactive force of revelation.

Happiness is the removal of frustration from our efforts to relax and recreate.

Contentment will neutralize intellectual and emotional desire for attention.
(To be content with this list of suggestions is an exercise if finding agreement.)
(IN RESOLVE) Try to replace "happy" with content,
Then consider the vow "For better or for worse."
It is better to feel appreciation than to criticize.
When we think things could get worse we feel forced into a critical attitude.
The environment of appreciation is a better feeling of supportive energy.
So the basic choice is to be appreciative or critical and the more balanced the state of mind allows choice to create contentment. Diplomatic control of emotion is suave.

Labels: ,

Wednesday, May 05, 2010

Differently Abled

I was told in my disability support group that a newer framing is to be called Differently Abled.
To be Differently Abled is a challenge for normalcy just to understand.
The evidence of avoidance is unrecognizable ignorance or symptomatic reflexive denial.
The fact that there is no evidence doesn't mean there isn't a greater truth than understanding allows for in behavior evidence.
What if awareness is healthy in terms of appreciation?
The human choice to be critical just might make that style of awareness pathological (and that needs appreciation to be considered.)

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, February 02, 2010

I respect my regrets

Regrets are the by-product of choice...
Any choice should generate regrets as optional factors.
To believe in "no regrets" is to rely on (manifest) destiny and/or ignorance because if authorities (like parents) make choices for us we regret them (both)...
I recommend the decision (dialog) process as supportive (democratic) inclusion; in contrast to critical (debate) limitations that seem like exclusive power pathology.
Making a healthy choice allows me to to consider my regrets as empathy exercise.
The lack of empathy is evidence of cons piracy, the privateer class has succeeded from the unity...
Integrity is only relative to how it is understood...
.. consider the need for partners to create stereo and perspective (3-D) (or is it all in my head?)
Response abilities are matters of the heart... I feel..

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, December 01, 2009

for giving knowledge

Performance enhancement is reaching beyond what's known.
God was too aware to think Adam and Eve wouldn't eat the fruit of knowledge.
Reflexively they blamed the warning instead of appreciating how creative the suggestion might have been to avoid that reflex and the apple.

What if a better parental model would have been that God told the first (teen-age?) couple that any instructions will be ridiculed because choice is a *joke? (*that kills the getter or the giver dies)
What if God warned them that choosing to eat that apple will change the conceptual / mental attitude of appropriate behavior?
CHOICE is either resolved with support or questioned by advantage indulgence.

Response can be critical or supportive as the basic choice.
Criticism seems symptomatic with frustration.
Support is the reasonable happiness.
When choice validates it is supportive but any variation on previous knowledge could become critical.

When Cain attacked Abel he tried to blame God for being critical instead of appreciating his sacrifice. This is the reflex of judgment that causes war.
Sharing is the only remedy for dis-ease caused by imbalanced contentment.
The amount of our time spent being content is the value knowing thy self.

The behavior of blame, shame, and threatening are symptoms of critical toxicosis.
The effort to appreciate is the value to increase being which is a primal growth drive.
Peace within is the struggle that the First Noble Truth (& Christianity) suggests is the value of suffering in order to forgive.

Labels: , , ,

Thursday, September 10, 2009

Choice IS gambling

My birth was planned on so many levels I was surprised when friends would say they were a mistake. Caregiving is such a powerful reflex, it allows for many mistakes to become appreciated and even cherished. If the best choice is to be supportive, would the critical opposite be a mistake?

What you see is what you accept or reject, your choice to get. Reasoning will either affirm or deny basic styles of awareness like traditional or exceptional. What I don't agree with seems to make me critical.

The critical element will create danger (anger.) The risk factor determines regret. Having a regret proves there was a choice. People use destiny (like religion) to pretend their choices were made by a higher force than just self empowerment.

Habit is a good way to make behavior predetermined. Reflexes are empowered memories that relate to timing. Judgments of the past are remembered as rules.

Exceptions were made before rules or we couldn't all be made exceptional. Is this the riddle of the equal individual?

Questionable behavior reveals unique points of view to be shared.
The collective consciousness is the concept of accessible imagination being a wave that offers reception through invested interest.
We create attraction by defining desires and how they relate to others.
For every action the equal reaction is most recognized as The Golden Rule or Karma. The basic choice is to support or to deny the priorities of our relative realities.

Experience reveals the patterns of growth that become the stories that share relations. We must relate to community as communication of unity if we choose support.

Labels: