CONSpiracy

The privateer movement may have stolen the power of democracy.
The idea that the public could be honestly represented is fading.
Too many of us hear representatives speaking of opposite values as if we are not the people worth life, liberty, and pursuit of our happiness. Who are they trying to convince, or (just) con?

The con behavior has to be recognized and properly adjusted for.
We have all experienced the feeling of admiration to someone wealthier than us but did we realize this is authoritarianism? Every spiritual practice warns about money changers and usury. Conceptual value is where the attitude of conning comes from. The con is a risk because of penalties from mistakes that should have educational values to draw from. Why does penalizing others make some people happy? Happiness is inevitably related to someone's frustration, which leads me to the con we agree happens as malpractice. Any effort to remain in balance I would like to consider as the best compromise of contentment.

Could the most powerful source of discontent lead back to the dynamic that campaign finance represents? Taxation is an inappropriate demand to finance our own repression. Defensive conditioning is the main reason for influence peddling. The Bible was the most influential publication from the invention of the printing press until Common Sense by Thomas Paine. He was able to express observations of behavior that changed the human condition to allow for more freedom. When monarchies privately owned countries by god-given decree, battles were normal ways of maintaining boundaries. The American revolution was the realization that individuals could exemplify better behavior if they related in harmony with shared efforts to expand boundaries.

Public service was the personal gain of participation. The government could be all inclusive if participation was creditable. People who believe in smaller government could be encouraged out of the way by proving their private interests erode the power of public options as choice controllers. The constitution implies participation is entitlement for the way that "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" implies educational and health assurances. Proof that democracy makes individual conditions an asset is the appreciation factor. Who makes that seem debatable?

Efforts to maintain national values should strive to be more inclusive as the definition of an evolutionary peace movement. The symptoms we are going in an opposite direction is in how tax dollars become foreign aide as military expenditures. Why do defensive people seem threatened?

Bipartisanship keeps looking more like private party membership in competing sport clubs. The competition for representative positions is a cost growing process that wastes half of the investment on inevitable losers. Selection of quality behavior seems to have resentment built-in, generated by how we choose. For better or for worse, the evaluation process needs (a third branch of) respect to relax the penalties of harsh judgment. Personality is a derivative used to cover-up experiences that justify needs for privacy from penalty so we can reveal our pride.

The rate at which we understand behavior projects attitudes to encourage optional growth. Privately taken, this rate can abuse standards of coexistence. Could that growth become a tumor? Relaxing the anxieties these clusters of habits symbolize deserve attention. The study of balance is an evolving educational investment that any system claiming equality would consider able to mature insurance to become assurance.

The old way is the cons way that will keep working without equal investment in evolution. The TV is on to the Health Summit as I write. Watching dialog develop makes me recognize the effect of my attitude being supportive or critical.
I consider the critical situation that automatically doubles costs by making sure there are two sides to everything, both needing to be paid for time spent.
Style of partnerships portray characters of participation in roles of representative values. Balancing responsibilities reflects recognition that membership becomes cancerous with overindulgence.

Controlling the market is in the reason to encourage consumerism. So marketing demands consider more responsibility than financial balance. Public representation must realize that acting government allows too much privacy to not become privateering. The pirates code is a critical revulsion of public compromise that allows for adaptability beyond reason, so don't forget historic cycles. There has always been cons-piracy. Now its called networking as the most agreeable intention.

The attraction to this trait has to be first step in treatment behaviors to advance better health technique so that being healed will advance sharing the story as information. Consider why information gathering reaches for levels of intelligence.
One person's medicinal treatment reveals what could be more careful for others if sharing was a greater credit to self-supportive rights. Suspicion is the cost of being a freedom seeking human.

Deficit thinking allows the responsibility of derivative thoughts to create assets for conceptual properties. Doesn't this allow the deficit gamble on the public be lost to the credit design of banks? Couldn't the reality of living balanced demand that the credit for their figure should be distributed to the default winners (of the payment position) by their place in the market? The ticket holders are the more obvious victims. Students should come out of college with credit for what now appears to be a debt. Health is the asset of a citizen that could be an allowance credit. Reward individuals for healthy appointment histories as a right to "life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness." Lifespan care extends to the health of a culture.

con fused knowing

At the times when the world seems too critical, there must be ways to appeal for support?
I must ask you to maintain support for my explanation and observe how the critical awareness changes as a choice of consciousness.
Awareness is the creative consciousness redefining life and projecting as self-expression.

Self image is the critical element of reaching beyond destiny.
Earth as a garden of Eden was created as the ultimate supportive nature before the knowledge of history tears us from a sharing destiny.

Knowing, that we are paired, separates human consciousness from the inevitability of nature correcting for us, by consideration of toxic mixing.
Human nature is an oxymoron.
Mankind has a life-span in the image of each human and critical knowledge can spend or extend that budget.
Energy is a paradox to control the power of too much (indulgence) at once.

Appreciation of life is paired with respecting death, as similar to needing two legs to stand on.
The body is a handy example of many pairs that allow multiple support systems to work together to reach beyond limitations of each separately.
Two eyes create the third dimension of depth and perspective, two ears, stereo.
Was it the separated halves of the brain that created the tree of knowledge?

For better of for worse we must struggle with ourselves to re take mistakes.
What if the creator did not tell humans not to eat the apple of truth but that it would change our consciousness to be critical?
Can we forgive ourselves for misinterpretation?
Is the defense impulse that critical?

To support what I am implying demands that you learn contentment with confusion.
To be aware is to step out of unity in order to observe it.
This frustration is also what allows for happiness.
(this was inspired watching The Time Traveler's Wife)

Sherri Tepper

Beauty is what I'm reading for Valentine's day,
I first read Singer From The Sea,
then The Gates to Woman's Country,
Fresco was the most science fiction,
but Plague of Angels led me back to magic..

VictimMISERS sold US

The reason Obama became president was the behavior he demonstrated INDEPENDENT from the system.
In 2009, when he first sat down publicly with just Hilary he demonstrated the ability to turn debate into dialog (with a responsible person.)
He acknowledges expanding awareness of the polarization imposed on American ideals. The two Americas he alludes to have become multi-dimensional frustrations. The support he shows is patient, too patient for the extreme power of the military and the banks to be forced to be realistic.
Business as usual is not going to work but his timing must be genius and inspired.
Democratic party behavior could allow him to create an Independent movement if he hopes to take any liberties.
Enough population is Fed-up with partisan pick-pocketing of the governmental assurances that insurance industries reserve to cover their gambling.

Financing allows deficit thinking to undermine what credit could support as the best growth potential. The attachment of expectations have become unreasonable and unbalanced. Penalties are a derivative of lessons that should educate for better credit. Losses are symptoms of the need to change values.
The way President Obama admitted his losses at The State of The Union Address indicates more initiative than the status quo can maintain in its present form. SO I urge independence from the beholding system.

Rename the the financial system controlling the government because it negates Federal credit with nothing in Reserve. Creative Independent Banking could derive credit support from the deceit of the deficit. Reward citizen participation in programs to learn and stay healthy.
The public option to respond in time by getting credit for reporting health concerns could save unnecessary expenditures (for profit purposes.) Check-ups should be like census. Willingness to honestly admit all pharmaceutical experiments could expedite the kind of record-keeping applications that could benefit human health continuity. Build trust in computerized records as representative of valued conditions of maintenance.
Doctors (and other students) who practice invested education could earn respect if credit was healthier by removing the parasite of debt. Respecting the patient could be a provisional credit for appreciative behavior. Diagnosis is harsh enough!

The dynamic of choice is that it is either appreciative or critical. Evaluation (appreciation) is a process that judgment (criticism) tries to cut short. (with incorporation?)

The President must realize by now he is independent of corporate interest and must invest in appreciation for recreating credit as a new constitutional convention from the derivative values stolen by the misers to make the public victims.. Expensive campaigns must be exposed as untrustworthy.
The distrustful attitudes of advertising (& framing) must become better understood.
To prove independence from financial blackmail, candidates must use new media (& supportive journalistic events) with the code word "NON-Partisan" for unity sake.

BI PARTISAN?

Doesn't BI mean two? So doesn't that mean it is still TOO Partisan?
What we need is independence from party politics. But, the parties supply the money needed to get elected, so isn't that the symptom of unfair practices?
Even among the parties, the primaries seem more like battles every year.
If we want a peaceful government we representatives who declare independence.
The value of behavior must rise above money spent when visibility is so critical.
If we could understand the only responsible choice is supportive posturing.
Acting critical is what is undermining the Republican emotional reaction as less intelligent with every redundant deception.
The democratic are just as beholding to invested controllers.
The idea of non-partisan influence would allow human support to emerge.

gambling social security

There is behavior so toxic, it fails to be supportable.
Conceptual threats manifest as blame and shame.
Critical domination is the example why humans need empathy for the defense of respectable principles.
Denial of others is the weakness of others for powers like political entitlement.
The failure of refining power with progressive natural sustainability is the pathological subsidy.

The teachers who can illustrate this deficiency compensation can convey power as energy investment.
The spirit of health is the adaptation of experience into relative educational eras of sharing as redistribution.

The physicians' job is to entertain the patients while they accept the time it takes to heal systems within our greater selves.
The power of the great depression to ruin the sustainability of so many families allowed for a New (Deal) job market of social work as an energetic empathy.
Consider the name Salvation Army, which not only distributed fish and loaves but taught many how to fish and make bread.

The purpose of Social Security was to provide a basic assurance.
The paradox is how insurance has a pathological twist to include gambling.
The reason only 5% of Americans had insurance in 1950 was that it was understood as a wealthy man's gambling game by the prosperous.
In 1958 my dad joked that he would have to get insurance now that my mom was getting her drivers' license, later came the consideration of no-fault policies.
Insurance was created and evolved into a job market parallel to the concept of derivatives.

Profit represents production values.
The Industrial Revolution used the fuel of profits to run a corporate course at break-neck speed which left domestic production in the dust.
The low compensation for teachers (and education in general) was that it didn't create a product (or become a respectable job market fast enough.)
Consider how conceptual and intellectual property was exploited by Westinghouse in the power development game with the patents for alternating energy which left Edison's linear concept of direct current flat.

The power of credit became pathologically connected to insurance when we were required to pay every month for a value we never hoped to need (or use.)
The encouragement of exponential growth in the Insurance Industry came from President Johnson's Great Society.
The credit for Medicare is that it recognized that workers would gamble with insurance payments to a point of over appreciation and substitute for saving.

Social security honored the risk people are willing give as attention to people other than wealth. Individual freedom is perishable enough that.. an assurance policy is what The Constitution was designed to inspire from supporters, too bad critics become so easily perverted to gambling.

I respect my regrets

Regrets are the by-product of choice...

Any choice should generate regrets as optional factors.

To believe in "no regrets" is to rely on (manifest) destiny and/or ignorance because if authorities (like parents) make choices for us we regret them (both)...

I recommend the decision (dialog) process as supportive (democratic) inclusion; in contrast to critical (debate) limitations that seem like exclusive power pathology.

Making a healthy choice allows me to to consider my regrets as empathy exercise.

The lack of empathy is evidence of cons piracy, the privateer class has succeeded from the unity...

Integrity is only relative to how it is understood...

.. consider the need for partners to create stereo and perspective (3-D) (or is it all in my head?)

Response abilities are matters of the heart... I feel..