B.ush S.upreme

Bush is the example of no political interest accumulated.
The deciding moment defines symptomatic behavior of parasitic nature,
because he was so obviously a corporate raider & oil price manipulator.

The extreme results focuses a larger agreement of who has to be held responsible for the changes that makes this country more socialistic than ever allowed. To make this a bigger injustice these victimizers will make us believe that it can be reversed. The only chance (for that) would be for The Supreme Court to declare as "unconstitutional" the propaganda style of totalitarianism Bush represented.
THEY should void their decision to give him access!

Republican vasectomy

We must convince The Bush Machine that McCain harbors enough resentment for past "tricks" on him that McCain would kick their balls with access to their power. The unpredictable Maverick image is doing a great job since they (all) are suspicious of everything.
That is the best way to get their control over elections to consider his loss best for Bush's "cover."

demo-turnout

Bush de-moralized his party!

troops are defensive

BUSH IS OFFENSIVE

elect to probation

Nixon's counsel, John Dean says this Bush has misunderstood the Conservative meanings of his Goldwater ideals and will turn the word conservative as bad as liberal (is now!)
If you want anything more than you can afford you are liberal leaning!
*Tradition has defensive costs.
The real freedom (to dream) is in libertarianism of generously appreciating others as inclusive with creative rights, like pursuit of happiness.
Denial is depressing, to form a club is asking for a fight*.

Everybody that runs for president should get a job, chosen for them by the election. Allowing the public to mold its own cabinet gives credit to the characteristics each position needs and which personality most qualifies.
Debates will expose us to a behavioral science of debate (as a good argument,) and make those who quarrel end up in legal red-tape wrestling departments (as probation.)

By the way he treated McCain, I could tell G. W. Bush was going to weaken (even) his own party with polarity. He should have been elected to Entitlements, since that's what got him elected. This department starts with education and police enforcement and should include healthcare and utilities like in many (more) conservative countries.

government takes advantage

Government is the punishment for the style consumer we have become (as mean).
By wanting influence over others we must consider the legacy of manifest destiny.
Reparations seem most likely through campaign reform for as long as a product-based economy uses the spirit of donation to influence legislation the country will need materialistic slaves.
Freedom can evolve the spirit of service.
Health care is the entitlement our bodies deserve as vehicles (of all action). The form of attachment health plans have with jobs echo present forms of coercion being used by our government even as far as It's foreign policy. The "rewarded" payments to some countries stresses It's intention to punish adversaries with a style that encourages fights in order to justify waring attitudes. The policy to declare war on things like drugs, poverty and illiteracy show It's dependence on aggression.
The costs of a punitive system are reaching the obvious level of need to yield to a restorative attitude.

The profit motive of capitalism means we have to "take advantage" of everything we can . . I like to believe the information age might develop a spirit of suggested donation to equalize individual distractions, people are starting to see we can win together(ness) when the advantage gives up the need for losers. Is the Republican Party losing its strength by flaunting how much (advantage) it won at once? To stop paying into this system we could develop a "service" mentality for suggested donation and praise the power of generousity as it develops a cure for this credit/ debt dis-ease.

can you say grace . .

This Administration is an example of how the words indignation and dignity relate as opposites. It seems the more indignant the spokesmen act the less dignity our system seems to inspire, or is it that the less dignity that this group allows itself to expose the more indignant it seems to act (even to its own party members). Too many people are having to eat it . .