credit health
The way credit and insurance is sold as a product for profit is the simplest image of considerable complexity presented to accept as necessary gamble for change. The symptomatic domino debt penalty bankruptcy denial duration must be expressed blatantly confusing for submission to legal language ultimately exercises the strength to lock everyone else up as trophies of what productive gain?
What if my resistance to conventional financial approaches deserves to be outed (rather than outlawed) as a quality of free thinking the founding fathers motivated in evolutionary expression of individual equality as conceptual autonomy to become statements of rights?
Pure democratic philosophy could allow credit entitlement as expression of individual equality. This concept was well expressed as social security but how that model was used for (extortion-like) profit (by insurance companies) exposes the extremes of pathology capitalism forces on democratic health.
What if my resistance to conventional financial approaches deserves to be outed (rather than outlawed) as a quality of free thinking the founding fathers motivated in evolutionary expression of individual equality as conceptual autonomy to become statements of rights?
Pure democratic philosophy could allow credit entitlement as expression of individual equality. This concept was well expressed as social security but how that model was used for (extortion-like) profit (by insurance companies) exposes the extremes of pathology capitalism forces on democratic health.
posted by brad4d | 9:11 AM
4 Comments:
try to read this aloud, esp. the first paragraph
Well said Bradford, absolutely right too!
This 'conceptual autonomy' is the hallmark of humanity, the very backbone of human intellectual evolution, an evolution that is first, not last in importance, and all layers should have room to exist and grow and change without discrimination.
Capitalism does exactly as you say, poisons the ground and prevents democracy from true expression, makes a farce of the conceptual possibles.
I notice in this post also, the very problem with the bible per se, the translations taint the truth which is social and intellectual justice and freedom for all, even those who are invaded are given room to agree, but 'bent' of translation from preconceptions held for less worthy motives prevent the understandings, and that prevents the democracy that is actually available, even right now.
Alas, but, we will keep at it.
Brad, you make things to complex, just how many people do you expect to understand you?
Bill, how many your age did you expect to understand blogging two years ago? Care is recognized even if misunderstood, like having to care enough (even) to hate it. Since you don't complain, you appreciate something about it. Thanks for your blunt honesty. That's the spirit!
Post a Comment
<< Home