deny terror is (th)em?
Those that have been "trickling down" on the economy know who they are and must admit their responsibility to treat the denial virus that is infecting free-enterprise with plundering behavior.
Profit is becoming obvious that it is always more than reasonable support and purposefully designed to take advantage of laissez-faire respectability.
The reversal of basic laws of procedure shows that behavior description is a better judge of character than the paradox of opinion.
Whose behavior is supportive versus that which is obvious critical?
What direction leads to the greater contentment and how does the symptom of asking us to risk sacrifice distract us from the deceivers? (invest vs gamble)
If they are responsible for aggressive indulgences, shouldn't assets be frozen for preservation of promised investment values?